Key points
- Generative AI tools neither help nor harm a film's chances of Oscar nomination under the 98th cycle rules.
- Judges weigh the degree to which a human was at the heart of creative authorship when evaluating eligible works.
- The human-authorship standard was recommended by the Academy's Science and Technology Council.
Summary
The Academy's rules for the 98th Oscars, approved in April 2025, establish that the use of generative AI tools does not automatically disqualify or advantage a film for nomination consideration. Instead, judges are directed to weigh the degree to which a human was at the heart of creative authorship. This standard, recommended by the Academy's Science and Technology Council, became the reference point for how the screen production industry frames the human-AI authorship question and is already cited in screen production program curricula as the eligibility test students should understand.
Related items
- Thaler v. Perlmutter: Supreme Court denies certiorari, human-authorship requirement upheld
- The Artist-Driven Innovation Behind the Films We Love
Source
Source: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences ↗ (Sector Org)
Cite this item
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (2025). ‘98th Academy Awards Rules: AI and Human Authorship’, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Available at: https://press.oscars.org/news/awards-rules-and-campaign-promotional-regulations-approved-98th-oscarsr
Your reference manager can also read this page directly: with the Zotero (or Mendeley) browser connector installed, save it straight to your library. Whole-collection exports: RIS, BibTeX, CSL-JSON.