Key points
- Focus group study pairing arts educators and students in Spanish higher education.
- Consensus that generative AI supports illustration work but cannot replace the human factor.
- Positions generative AI as a motivating pedagogical strategy when explicitly framed.
Summary
This qualitative study uses paired focus groups with arts educators and students in Spanish higher education to examine how generative AI is perceived and used in arts programs. Participants reached broad consensus that generative AI can usefully support illustration-related work but cannot replace the human creative element. The study also finds that when AI tools are explicitly framed as pedagogical instruments rather than substitutes, they function as a motivating element in the learning experience. It is one of few studies capturing both educator and student perspectives together within arts HE.
Related items
- Human-AI Co-Creation or Conflict? Art Students' Perspectives on Creative Identity
- Empowering Student Learning in HE with Generative AI Art Applications: Systematic Review
Source
Source: Informatics (MDPI) ↗ (Research)
Cite this item
Informatics (MDPI) (2024). ‘Analysing the Impact of Generative AI in Arts Education’, Informatics (MDPI). Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9709/11/2/37
Your reference manager can also read this page directly: with the Zotero (or Mendeley) browser connector installed, save it straight to your library. Whole-collection exports: RIS, BibTeX, CSL-JSON.