Key points
- Analysis of UK university AI policies finds 41 per cent of 163 degree-awarding institutions have no easily findable public AI policy.
- Four exemplar policies are named, including creative-arts specialist Arts University Plymouth.
- A policy's hosting location predicts its function: misconduct-framework policies enforce compliance, learning-and-teaching policies educate.
Summary
HEPI Policy Note 71, authored by Illingworth, S. and published 21 May 2026, analyses AI policies across 163 UK degree-awarding institutions. It finds that over two-fifths have no publicly findable AI policy, and identifies a structural pattern in how policies function depending on where they are housed. The naming of Arts University Plymouth as an exemplar among four institutions, and the analytical framework distinguishing compliance-oriented from education-oriented policies, make this the reference study for any UK creative-arts institution writing or reviewing its own AI policy.
Related items
Source
Source: Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) ↗ (Research)
Cite this item
Illingworth, S. (2026). ‘What UK university AI policies actually do: a study of 96 institutions (HEPI Policy Note 71)’, Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). Available at: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/reports/what-uk-university-ai-policies-actually-do-a-study-of-96-institutions/
Your reference manager can also read this page directly: with the Zotero (or Mendeley) browser connector installed, save it straight to your library. Whole-collection exports: RIS, BibTeX, CSL-JSON.