Key points
- The first peer-reviewed qualitative study of practising VFX artists' attitudes to AI, via interviews with nine experienced artists.
- It documents both optimism for automation and concern over intellectual property, displacement and creative integrity.
- It finds AI products often required more combined human and computational labour, challenging simple replacement narratives.
Summary
This open-access study by Narayan, Caillard, Matthews and Nairn reports qualitative interview findings from nine experienced VFX artists on their perceptions of AI in production. The research surfaces genuine complexity: artists hold concurrent hopes for automation and anxieties about displacement, IP, and creative ownership. A key finding challenges simple replacement narratives by demonstrating that AI-assisted workflows often increase total labour rather than reduce it, which has direct implications for how educators frame AI's effect on craft and career.
Related items
- The Artist-Driven Innovation Behind the Films We Love
- Critical Crossroads: GenAI and the Animation Workforce
Source
Source: Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture (Intellect) ↗ (Research)
Cite this item
Narayan, A. D., Caillard, D., Matthews, J. & Nairn, A. (2024). ‘Artificial Imagination: Industry Attitudes on the Impact of AI on the VFX Process’, Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture (Intellect). Available at: https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00056_1
Your reference manager can also read this page directly: with the Zotero (or Mendeley) browser connector installed, save it straight to your library. Whole-collection exports: RIS, BibTeX, CSL-JSON.